Regu Report
Monday, October 6, 2025
  • Finance
    • Financial Services
    • Insurance
    • Superannuation
    • Economy
    • Productivity
  • Legal
    • Competition
    • Privacy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Employment & Workplace Relations
    • Communications
    • Human Rights
    • Law Reform
  • Corporate
  • Property
  • Science
    • Environment
    • Technology
  • Agriculture
  • Transport
  • Sport
No Result
View All Result
  • Finance
    • Financial Services
    • Insurance
    • Superannuation
    • Economy
    • Productivity
  • Legal
    • Competition
    • Privacy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Employment & Workplace Relations
    • Communications
    • Human Rights
    • Law Reform
  • Corporate
  • Property
  • Science
    • Environment
    • Technology
  • Agriculture
  • Transport
  • Sport
No Result
View All Result
Regu Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal Competition

The Good Guys fined $13.5m for misleading store credit offers

Catarina Brooks by Catarina Brooks
9 September 2025
in Competition, Finance, Financial Services, Legal
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
12
SHARES
106
VIEWS
Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on X

The Federal Court has ordered The Good Guys to pay $13.5 million in penalties after finding the appliance retailer engaged in misleading conduct over its store credit and “StoreCash” promotions and failed to provide credits to thousands of eligible customers.

The proceedings related to 116 promotions run by The Good Guys between July 2019 and August 2023 in which it offered customers store credit (also called StoreCash in some promotions) if they spent a minimum amount, bought a specific brand or product, or used a particular payment method. The amount of credit varied between $10 and $1,000 depending on the promotion.

RELATED POSTS

ASIC wins travel ban and asset freeze in First Guardian probe

Beacon Minerals insider trading: Darryl Mapleson sentenced

The Good Guys admitted its advertisements for those promotions did not disclose, or adequately disclose, the expiry period of the store credit — which for the majority of promotions was as short as seven or 10 days — or, in most cases, that customers would only receive a store credit if they remained opted in to The Good Guys’ marketing communications.

“We took this court action because we were concerned that The Good Guys had failed to adequately disclose some really key conditions attached to these store credit promotions,” ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

“The chance to earn store credit may have encouraged some consumers to make a purchase at The Good Guys they otherwise may not have made or to choose this retailer over others. We were concerned some of those consumers may not have done so had they been aware of all the conditions.”

“When advertising promotional offers, all businesses must clearly disclose any key terms and conditions or limitations to avoid misleading consumers. Businesses that fail to do so could potentially face court proceedings and large penalties,” Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.

The Good Guys also admitted it failed to provide about 21,500 consumers with store credit within the time frame it had specified. “Businesses that use promotional programs to attract consumers and differentiate themselves from their competitors must ensure they provide any gifts or rebates to eligible consumers in the time period they said they would,” Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.

As well as the $13.5 million penalty, the Court ordered The Good Guys to provide redress to certain customers who took part in promotions that did not disclose, or adequately disclose, the expiry period by issuing store credit with a longer expiry. The retailer will contact consumers eligible for redress, the ACCC said.

The Good Guys has already remediated consumers who did not receive their store credit because they failed to meet the condition requiring them to remain opted in to marketing material, and the roughly 21,500 consumers who did not receive their credit within the specified time. The company co‑operated with the ACCC, admitted liability and agreed to make joint submissions to the Court about orders, including penalties.

The Court accepted joint submissions that part of the conduct contravened consumer protection provisions of the ASIC Act, on the basis that the supply of store credit and StoreCash is a financial service; ASIC delegated its powers under the ASIC Act to certain senior officers of the ACCC to take the enforcement action. The Court also found The Good Guys contravened the Australian Consumer Law by failing to provide store credits to approximately 21,500 consumers within the time specified.

The Good Guys is an Australian household appliance chain that operates both physical stores and an online business; its parent company is JB Hi‑Fi Limited (ASX: JBH). The ACCC instituted proceedings against the retailer on 11 July 2024 as part of a wider focus on consumer and fair trading concerns in the supermarket and retail sectors, with particular attention to misleading pricing practices.

Tags: ACCCAdvertisingAustralian Consumer LawconsumerFederal CourtGina Cass-GottliebMisleading & Deceptive ConductMisleading Conduct
Share1Share5Tweet3ShareSend
Catarina Brooks

Catarina Brooks

Catarina Brooks is a graduate journalist who focuses on competition and consumer affairs. She is passionate about covering the stories that impact everyday Australians, from market trends to regulatory shifts.

Related Posts

Federal Court extends asset freeze on First Mutual Private Equity and director Gregory Cotton to safeguard investor funds

ASIC wins travel ban and asset freeze in First Guardian probe

by Maddie Crawley
4 October 2025
0

The Federal Court has imposed interim travel bans on Falcon Capital Limited directors David Anderson and Simon Selimaj and ordered...

Federal Court extends asset freeze on First Mutual Private Equity and director Gregory Cotton to safeguard investor funds

Beacon Minerals insider trading: Darryl Mapleson sentenced

by Maddie Crawley
4 October 2025
0

Geological services provider Darryl Brian Mapleson has been sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment for insider trading, with the Supreme Court...

Australia and New Zealand information access commissioners (AIAC) issue communiqué, 2–3 October 2025

Australia and New Zealand information access commissioners (AIAC) issue communiqué, 2–3 October 2025

by Tony Lee
3 October 2025
0

Australia’s information watchdogs have urged public sector leaders to treat access to information as a cornerstone of innovation, environmental sustainability...

Updated land cover data better reflects a changing landscape

Nine insights into Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ nutrition

by Sophia Merrick
3 October 2025
0

The Australian Bureau of Statistics has released its first detailed snapshot of nutrition among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples...

ACCC clears acquisition of BGC Cementitious after changes to deal

Telstra fined $18 million for misleading Belong customers about broadband speeds

by Catarina Brooks
3 October 2025
0

The Federal Court has ordered Telstra to pay an $18 million penalty after the company moved almost 9,000 Belong customers...

Next Post

Former United Petroleum outlet operators fined

Court rules on Money3 responsible lending case

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED

CSIRO launches R&D program for critical minerals SMEs

CSIRO launches R&D program for critical minerals SMEs

4 October 2025
Federal Court extends asset freeze on First Mutual Private Equity and director Gregory Cotton to safeguard investor funds

ASIC wins travel ban and asset freeze in First Guardian probe

4 October 2025
  • 100 Followers

MOST VIEWED

  • Glass repair operators hit with $116,550 in penalties

    12 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
  • TAB hit with $4m penalty for spamming VIP customers

    12 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
  • Western Sydney café’s former operators appear in court

    12 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
  • Power bank recalls surge amid reports of severe burns and property damage

    12 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
  • Home values up 1.9% in June

    12 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
Regu Report

Bringing you the latest news from the world of regulation, compliance, corporate governance and industry in Australia.

TOPICS

  • Agriculture
  • Communications
  • Competition
  • Corporate
  • Economy
  • Employment & Workplace Relations
  • Environment
  • Finance
  • Financial Services
  • Human Rights
  • Insurance
  • Law Reform
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Property
  • Science
  • Superannuation
  • Technology

INFORMATION

  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Regu Report.

No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Homepage Layout 1
    • Homepage Layout 2

© 2025 Regu Report.